Which of the following is NOT a predicate offense under 18 U.S.C. 2339B?

The correct answer is that arson as a form of protest is not considered a predicate offense under 18 U.S.C. 2339B. This specific statute deals primarily with the provision of material support or resources to designated foreign terrorist organizations. Predicate offenses refer to specific criminal acts that are associated with these terrorist activities.

In the context of 18 U.S.C. 2339B, the focus is on offenses that directly relate to terrorism or facilitating terrorist organizations. Visa fraud, smuggling contrary to law, and lying on immigration documents can all be associated with actions that may support or finance terrorist activities, thus making them relevant under this statute. These crimes could potentially be used to facilitate the movement of individuals or resources that aid terrorists, which aligns with the objectives of 18 U.S.C. 2339B.

On the other hand, while arson can be a serious crime, committing arson as a form of protest typically does not relate directly to supporting a terrorist organization. It is more often viewed in the context of civil disobedience or social protest, rather than an act intended to further terrorist aims, thus excluding it from being classified as a predicate offense under this particular statute.